31.08.2012 19:16:00
|
MediMedia USA, Inc. -- Moody's changes MediMedia's outlook to negative from stable
A summary of today's actions follows.
MediMedia USA, Inc
....Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed at Caa1
....Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed at Caa1
....Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility
-15.3 million Tranche A-1 Revolving Loan maturing October 2012, Affirmed at B2 (LGD2-24%)
-29.7 million Tranche A-2 Revolving Loan maturing August 2014, Affirmed at B2 (LGD2-24%)
-0.7 million Tranche B-1 Term Loan maturing October 2013, Affirmed at B2 (LGD2-24%)
-115 million Tranche B-2 Term Loan maturing August 2014, Affirmed at B2 (LGD2-24%)
....Senior Subordinated Notes maturing November 2014, Affirmed at Caa2 (LGD changed to LGD-5, 78% from LGD-5, 79%)
....Outlook, Negative from Stable
SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE
MediMedia's Caa1 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects its weak liquidity position, its high leverage (7.0x as of June 30, 2012 including Moody's standard adjustments for lease expenses), and negative free cash flow. Also reflected in the rating, is the lack of success that the company has had turning around overall results driven primarily by weakness at its Pharmaceutical Marketing business since amending its credit facilities and extending the maturity dates post the sale of its Animal Health division. Its MediMedia Health division that performs marketing services for pharmaceutical companies has continued to struggle and we do not foresee an improvement in the near term. During the second half of 2012, we expect the company to face tight liquidity conditions as part of its revolver matures in Q4 2012 and its anticipated to have negligible availability on its extended revolver with a limited cushion of compliance with its covenants. The sale of its Animal Health and formulary database business in 2011 and the decline in its pharmaceutical business that was once one of its largest divisions leave the company smaller and less diversified than it had been previously.
Although a small part of overall EBITDA, the company's StayWell Health division has experienced some success turning around its operations after the LifeMaster acquisition which dramatically increased costs without generating a comparable amount of revenues. Its Krames StayWell business also provides support for the rating and is its largest business, although we expect EBITDA to be modestly lower for the FY 2012.
MediMedia's liquidity position is weak given the limited revolver availability post the October 5th 2012 maturity of its non extended revolver, the $7 million cash balance, negative expected free cash flow, and a limited cushion of compliance with its financial covenants. While the Animal Health transaction that closed in August 2011 improved their liquidity, it has deteriorated since then. We expect management to attempt to raise additional sources of liquidity in the near term. The company's Senior Leverage Ratio steps down to 3.5x in Q3 2012 from 3.75x currently which provides the company with a limited cushion of compliance. While the company may pass the leverage test in the near term, aided by the roll off of a weak second quarter 2011 from LTM results, the senior leverage test steps down again to 3.25x at the end of Q1 2013 and to 3x at the end of Q3 2013. MediMedia is also subject to a 1.5x Interest Coverage Ratio for the life of the loan and a $20 million limit on capital expenditures. The continued step downs in its Senior Leverage covenant levels and the slow pace of turning around its operating performance may leave the company at risk of violating its covenant levels. Given limited liquidity, first lien lenders may be reluctant to seek higher interest rates if a covenant is violated, but may seek additional asset sales to further reduce their loan exposure or may increase pressure for additional liquidity from its equity sponsor.
The negative rating outlook is driven by the weak liquidity position, lack of success improving operations, tight covenant levels and approaching maturities of its credit facility and subordinate notes in 2014. We expect EBITDA performance to grow modestly from current levels but it's unclear if it will be able to boost liquidity to an adequate level and if the rate of improvement will be strong enough to allow for a refinancing of its debt structure. The ability to shut down the underperforming MediMedia Health division that generates negative EBITDA currently could provide support for overall EBITDA levels if it does not improve in the near term. The limited capex spending due to poor liquidity may hinder the pace of a turnaround for the company. The leverage level is at the high end of the range appropriate for the rating level and positions the company at the low end of the current Caa1 CFR.
A change in the outlook to stable could occur if the company improves its operating performance, generates positive free cash flow over 5% of debt with adequate liquidity, reduces leverage below 6.5x on a sustained basis and the company becomes well positioned to refinance its debt structure.
Moody's would downgrade the rating if the company's leverage fails to improve below 6.5x on a sustained basis in the near term, its free cash flow or revolver availability failed to improve, its ability to meet debt obligations came into question, or the headroom under its covenants failed to improve from current levels. Any of which would increase the probability of default for the company.
Moody's Loss Given Default methodology (LGD) implies a B1 facility rating for the senior secured credit facilities. However, given the current negative outlook and the potential for additional senior obligations to provide added liquidity that would impact the LGD methodology, the LGD was overridden and the senior secured credit facility rating remained at B2.
The principal methodology used in rating MediMedia was the Global Publishing Industry Methodology published in December 2011. Other methodologies used include Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.
Headquartered in Yardley, Pennsylvania, MediMedia USA, Inc. (MediMedia) provides health information and services that inform consumers, physicians, and other healthcare decision makers. Its annual revenue is approximately $281 million as of June 30, 2012. The company is primarily owned by Vestar Capital Partners.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history. The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Scott Van den Bosch Vice President - Senior Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653John Diaz MD - Corporate Finance Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.
This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.