26.06.2012 19:42:00

Mauritius, Government of -- Moody's upgrades Mauritius's government bond rating to Baa1

London, 26 June 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service has today upgraded Mauritius's foreign- and local-currency government bond ratings to Baa1 from Baa2. The rating outlook is now stable. The rating action concludes Moody's review for possible upgrade initiated on 16 March 2012.

The main triggers for the upgrade are:

1.) the strengthened institutional framework, which is expected to further bolster the Mauritian economy's demonstrated resilience to shocks;

2.) the increased diversification of the economy into the high-value-added service sector as well as a growing conduit for foreign investment into Africa and Asia; and

3.) the government's significant progress in reducing its debt-servicing burden and improving its debt structure by lengthening maturities.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The main driver behind the decision to upgrade Mauritius' rating is the clear strengthening of the institutional framework, which is expected to permit the economy and public finances to circumvent a protracted negative impact from any shocks emanating from Europe, the country's largest trading partner. The rating agency observes that aggressive countercyclical measures kept the economy growing even during the global recession in 2009.

Buffers such as the National Resiliency Fund and the National Pension Fund as well as precautionary multilateral lending programmes have been established that will allow renewed countercyclical spending as needed in coming years without leading to renewed fiscal deterioration. Moody's points to the government's multi-year Public Sector Investment Programme (PSIP), which includes 8% of GDP spending in capital expenditures each year until 2016. The PSIP will primarily act as a countercyclical tool in order to counter the increasingly uncertain prospects of global growth. Additionally, the PSIP will help to redress critical supply-side constraints that will allow the Mauritian economy to be ready for the next global rebound.

The second main driver behind today's upgrade is the progress being made in diversifying the Mauritian economy, in part through the attraction of foreign direct investment (FDI) from multiple sources. FDI now is partially financing the structural current account deficit that appeared following the collapse in sugar and textile exports in the mid-2000s. Mauritius has undertaken various steps, including broadening its economic cooperation with China and India, and is actively transitioning the economy from a comparatively low-skilled exporter to that of a highly-skilled service-based economy. Progress in this area will mitigate the economy's external vulnerabilities, thereby maintaining its favourable external debt metrics even as the current investment push is widening the current account deficit.

The authorities are also positioning Mauritius as the main service platform for investing in Africa, which should bear fruit over the medium term. The Mauritian authorities are multiplying the number of taxation treaties they are negotiating with African countries in order to replicate the success they experienced with a similar treaty with India. The government is also in the process of internationalising the stock exchange from an equity-centric to an international multi-class asset-trading platform.

The third driver is the renewed positive trend in Mauritius's debt dynamics, after a temporary increase in debt was recorded during the global financial crisis. With short-term debt having shrunk to 22% of the total debt stock compared with 30% in 2007, rollover risk has diminished substantially. The government can rely almost entirely on the very liquid domestic debt markets, and its external exposure is modest, albeit increasing vis-a-vis multilateral lending. It should be noted that its debt affordability (the interest-payments-to-revenue ratio), has also improved from 21.7% in 2007 to 14% in 2011, primarily as a result of lower interest rates and better tax collection.

Although both Mauritius's affordability ratio and current debt stock still compare unfavourably with those of Baa-rated peer countries, Moody's remains cautiously confident that improvements in Mauritius's debt dynamics are likely to continue. In particular, the rating agency expects the country to borrow from multilateral and bilateral lenders on concessional terms over the next few years in order to finance its PSIP, while at the same time alleviating its overall debt service. Moody's views positively the Mauritian government's commitment, as stated in the amended 2008 Debt Management Act, to lower public-sector debt to below 50% of GDP by 2018 compared with 57% at the end of 2011.

Moody's has today also upgraded Mauritius's foreign-currency ceilings for bonds and deposits to A2 from Baa1 and to Baa1 from Baa2, respectively. The country ceilings for local-currency debt and deposits were adjusted to A1 from Aa2 to better capture the default correlation between the government and other domestic entities through their joint dependence on the real economy which remains relatively small.

WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATING UP/DOWN

A significant and permanent reduction of Mauritius' vulnerability to external volatility and shocks would exert positive pressure on the rating.

The Mauritian economy's relatively strong performance during the global financial crisis is attributable to extensive government intervention. As a small export-dependent economy, Mauritius is vulnerable to changes in global demand, in particular changes originating from its main trading partner, the European Union. Should external demand fail to recover sufficiently, Moody's warns that a further shock could lead to Mauritius recording substantial debt-metric deterioration, a scenario which would exert downward pressure on the rating.

PREVIOUS RATING ACTION & METHODOLOGY USED

Moody's last announcement affecting Mauritius's sovereign rating was implemented on 16 March 2012, when the country's ratings and ceilings were placed on review for possible upgrade. The action prior to that was taken on 14 December 2007, when Moody's downgraded Mauritius's local-currency bond rating to Baa2 from Baa1. At the time, the foreign-currency government bond rating and all the ceilings were confirmed.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in September 2008. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

The ratings of rated entity Mauritius, government of were initiated by Moody's and were not requested by this rated entity.

Rated entity Mauritius, government of or its agent(s) participated in the rating process. This rated entity or its agent(s), if any, provided Moody's access to the books, records and other relevant internal documents of the rated entity.

The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entities or their designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.

Information sources used to prepare each of the ratings are the following: parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entities, obligations or credits satisfactory for the purposes of issuing these ratings.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning the ratings is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Moody's Investors Service may have provided Ancillary or Other Permissible Service(s) to the rated entities or their related third parties within the two years preceding the credit rating action. Please see the special report "Ancillary or other permissible services provided to entities rated by MIS's EU credit rating agencies" on the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Aurelien Mali Vice President - Senior Analyst Sovereign Risk Group Moody'sInvestors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 Bart Oosterveld MD - Sovereign Risk Sovereign Risk Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Ltd. One Canada SquareCanary WharfLondon E14 5FA United Kingdom JOURNALISTS: 44 20 7772 5456 SUBSCRIBERS: 44 20 7772 5454 (C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.