11.12.2012 18:31:00

LIN Television Corporation -- Moody's assigns Ba2 to LIN's proposed 1st lien sr secured revolver; affirms B2 CFR

Approximately $948 million of rated debt affected

New York, December 11, 2012 -- Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba2 rating to LIN Television Corporation's ("LIN") proposed $75 million 1st lien secured revolver. The new revolver is being extended one year to October 2017 and pricing on the existing term loan B is being reduced. Proposed terms under the credit agreement include relaxing financial covenant levels and eliminating step downs. Moody's affirmed LIN's B2 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) and Probability of Default Rating (PDR), as well as the SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity (SGL) Rating. The rating outlook remains stable.

Assigned:

..Issuer: LIN Television Corporation

NEW $75 million 1st Lien Sr Secured Revolver: Assigned Ba2, LGD2 -- 18%

Affirmed:

..Issuer: LIN Television Corporation

.Corporate Family Rating: Affirmed B2

.Probability of Default Rating: Affirmed B2

1st lien sr secured term loan A due 2017 ($124.5 million outstanding): Affirmed Ba2, LGD2 -- 18%

1st lien sr secured term loan B ($258.1 million outstanding): Affirmed Ba2, LGD2 -- 18%

$200 million of 8.375% sr notes due 2018: Affirmed B3, LGD5 -- 75%

$290 million of 6.375% sr notes due 2021: Affirmed B3, LGD5 -- 75%

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating: Affirmed SGL -- 2

Outlook Actions:

..Issuer: LIN Television Corporation

......Outlook is Stable

To be withdrawn upon closing of the transaction:

..Issuer: LIN Television Corporation

EXISTING 1st lien sr secured revolver due 2016, Ba2, LGD2 -- 18%: To be withdrawn

RATINGS RATIONALE

LIN's B2 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects high leverage with a 2-year average debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.1x (including Moody's standard adjustments) estimated for December 31, 2012 reflecting improvement compared to 5.5x as of June 30, 2012 pro forma for the acquisition of New Vision Television. Strong demand for political advertising in the second half of 2012 resulted in an EBITDA boost and improved leverage to levels that were reported prior to the acquisition of New Vision Television. We expect LIN will utilize the majority of its free cash flow to reduce debt balances, leading to improved capacity to fund an acquisition or dissolution of the NBC JV within leverage parameters consistent with its B2 CFR. Moody's expects 2-year average leverage ratios to fall below 5.0x by the end of 2013, absent additional acquisitions. EBITDA should decline in the high single-digit percentage range in 2013, on a same store basis, due to the absence of significant political ad spending (more than $65 million in 2012), partially offset by low single-digit growth in core ad revenues and expected increases in retransmission fees. The company's leading market positions and good free cash flow generated by its geographically diverse portfolio of middle market television stations partially offset the negative impact of potential delays in achieving the portion of planned revenue synergies related to the New Vision acquisition and the overhang from LIN TV Corp.'s guarantee of the NBC JV debt. LIN has multiple network affiliates in 18 of its 23 markets leading to high revenue share and good margins. The proposed amendment reduces pricing on the term loan saving $1.9 million of cash interest in 2013. The amendment also provides a greater EBITDA cushion to financial maintenance covenants by relaxing the total leverage test to 7.0x from 6.0x, relaxing the senior leverage test to 3.75x from 3.0x, and eliminating leverage requirement step-downs. Moody's notes proposed terms provide management with greater flexibility to refinance at least a portion of the $815.5 million NBC JV note.

Ratings incorporate expectations that LIN will achieve the majority of its planned $25 million of revenue and expense synergies related to the New Vision acquisition by the end of 2014 and that retransmission revenues through the end of 2013 will increase for existing and newly acquired stations accompanied by higher expenses related to retransmission sharing fees (or reverse compensation) paid to the networks. Exposure to cyclical advertising revenue and the ongoing risk of audience diffusion resulting from media fragmentation weigh on debt ratings. Liquidity is good with minimum 2-year average free cash flow-to-debt ratios of 7% over the rating horizon and the absence of near term maturities. Ratings also reflect weaker than expected performance for the NBC JV with lower than initially anticipated retransmission revenues for 2013 and 2014, reduced ad revenue expectations primarily for the Dallas station, and the decision to fund construction of a new studio in Fort Worth. Although stronger EBITDA generation from LIN's stations in the second half of 2012 and lower debt balances offset weaker anticipated performance for the NBC JV in 2013, failure to keep the NBC JV on track with its revised operating plan would erode the asset coverage provided by the NBC JV stations putting additional downward pressure on LIN's debt ratings.

The NBC JV continues to be a significant overhang that poses elevated risk to LIN's credit profile given the recent increase in the expected shortfalls in meeting interest payments on its $815.5 million loan from General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC") through 2014 and given the decline in its asset value since the JV was formed in 1998. As of December 2011, the NBC JV was valued at $118 million less than amount due under the note; although significant, this value gap reflects improvement compared to the estimated $254 million gap between asset value and the note amount at FYE2010 and $366 million at FYE2009. Moody's believes the NBC JV has a greater reliance on the financial capacity of LIN due to increased potential that the value of the NBC JV will be less than the amounts owed related to the $815.5 million note at maturity in addition to any unpaid shortfall loans (currently not guaranteed by LIN). In January 2011, Comcast acquired 51% of NBCUniversal, Inc. with GE owning the remaining 49%. Additionally, LIN TV Corp. and GE agreed to fund interest coverage shortfalls with loans based on LIN's ownership interests (LIN 20% / GE 80%). Ratings hinge on our expectation that LIN will utilize free cash flow to reduce debt and leverage to increase its capacity to finance an acquisition or other dissolution of the NBC JV, particularly if it occurs prior to the 2023 GECC loan maturity. Under most scenarios, an acquisition or dissolution of the NBC JV would be leveraging to LIN. The company's capacity to fund a transaction without exceeding leverage metrics expected in the B2 CFR (as would be the case if a transaction occurred in the near term) increases the longer it can forestall such an event. Moody's believes LIN could fund a transaction within the B2 rating by the end of 2014 or 2015 assuming free cash flow continues to be applied to reduce debt balances and assuming no additional downward revisions to the operating plan of the NBC JV.

The stable rating outlook reflects our expectation that LIN will track Moody's base case forecast with core revenues growing in the low single digit percentage range resulting in 2-year average debt-to-EBITDA ratios (includes political and non-political years) remaining below 5.75x over the rating horizon and good liquidity including continued capacity to fund an additional $6 million of estimated debt service shortfalls of the NBC JV through 2014. The outlook does not include significant increases in debt balances to fund additional acquisitions resulting in elevated debt-to-EBITDA ratios. Ratings could be downgraded if an advertising downturn, cash distributions to shareholders, additional debt financed acquisitions, or the dissolution of the NBC JV results in 2-year average debt-to-EBITDA ratios being sustained above 6.0x (including Moody's standard adjustments) over the next 12 to 18 months. Beyond 12 to 18 months, debt-to-EBITDA ratios would need to be reduced sufficiently below FYE2012 levels to maintain a B2 CFR and to position the company for a refinancing of debt maturing in 2017-2018 while providing financial flexibility to resolve NBC JV obligations. Deterioration in liquidity including diminished capacity to cover debt service shortfalls at the NBC JV (that increases near term risk of dissolution of the JV) or other cash requirements could also result in a downgrade. An upgrade is not likely until there is a clear path to resolution of the overhang related to the NBC JV.

RECENT EVENTS

On November 15, 2012, the company launched LIN Mobile to provide mobile marketing solutions for clients nationwide. Management continues to add to its digital platform having acquired Nami Media in 2011 and RIMM in 2009. On November 14, 2012, the company extended its $25 million stock repurchase program to November 2013 from November 2012. A total of roughly $15 million has been repurchased since November 2011 leaving $10 million available under the program.

The principal methodology used in rating was the Broadcast and Advertising Related Industry Methodology published in May 2012. Other methodologies used include Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies.

LIN Television Corporation is headquartered in Providence, RI, and owns or operates 43 television stations plus 7 digital channels in 23 mid-sized U.S. markets ranked #22 to #188 reaching 10.6% of U.S. television households. In addition, LIN TV Corp., the company's parent, owns 20% of KXAS-TV in Dallas, TX and KNSD-TV in San Diego, CA, through a joint venture with NBCUniversal Media, LLC ("NBC JV"). HM Capital Partners LLC ("HMC") holds an approximate 42% economic interest in LIN and approximately 70% of voting control is held by HMC and Mr. Royal Carson III, a LIN director and advisor for HMC. The company is expected to generate approximately $550 million of net revenues for the fiscal year ended December 2012 (includes acquisition of New Vision from October 12, 2012)

REGULATORY DISCLOSURES

The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Ltd., One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E 14 5FA, UK, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that has issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com.

For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.

Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following : parties involved in the ratings, parties not involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.

Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.

Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for general disclosure on potential conflicts of interests.

Please see the ratings disclosure page on www.moodys.com for information on (A) MCO's major shareholders (above 5%) and for (B) further information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities as well as (C) the names of entities that hold ratings from MIS that have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%. A member of the board of directors of this rated entity may also be a member of the board of directors of a shareholder of Moody's Corporation; however, Moody's has not independently verified this matter.

Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.

Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.

The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com for further information.

Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.

Carl Salas Vice President - Senior Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody'sInvestors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653John Diaz MD - Corporate Finance Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc.250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376 SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653(C) 2012 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. ("MIS") AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error negligent or otherwise or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations -- Corporate Governance -- Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") are MJKK's current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, "MIS" in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with "MJKK". MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness or a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.