Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Screening and Management

SAN FRANCISCO, May 19, 2018 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer is increasing, and brings added value to screening and surveillance, according to new studies being presented this year during the 113^th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA). Four studies highlighting the effectiveness of MRI in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer will be presented during a special press conference on May 19 at 8:30 a.m. (PT). Stacy Loeb, MD, AUA spokesperson and assistant professor of urology and population health at New York University will moderate this session for media.

Study Details
Publication #: MP12-20

Prostate Health Index and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Prostate Cancer Grade Reclassification in Active Surveillance: When used together, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Prostate Health Index (PHI) may be useful for decreasing the burden of prostate biopsies in men on active surveillance (AS), according to Johns Hopkins researchers. While both mpMRI and PHI have shown independently to be valuable in predicting prostate cancer grade reclassification (Gleason score >6) in patients enrolled in AS, researchers at Johns Hopkins aimed to identify the value of combining them for the purpose of predicting grade reclassification at the next AS biopsy.

Researchers retrospectively identified 205 men enrolled in the Institution's AS program who underwent mpMRI and PHI within six months of each other, followed by a systematic mpMRI transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy. They then evaluated PHI and PHI density across Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) V2.0 scores and compared results between men with and without grade reclassification before calculating receiver operating characteristic curves to compare the diagnostic value of the PI-RADS score combined with PHI, PHID or prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSAD) for grade reclassification.

Results showed:

• Men with grade reclassification on biopsy had a higher median PHI (34.6 vs. 31.6, p=0.03) and PHID (0.79 vs. 0.56, p=0.03) compared to men without grade reclassification.
• PSA and PSAD were not significantly different between men with grade reclassification and those without it.
• Combined use of PHI < 24.4 and PI-RADS < 3 could have avoided 24 percent of active surveillance biopsies at the cost of missing only 4 percent of grade reclassification.

Study Details:
Publication #: MP77-14

Contemporary National Trends in Prostate MRI Among Patients Undergoing a Prostate Biopsy: Results from a Privately Insured Patient Population: A growing number of men are undergoing prostate biopsy with mpMRI as opposed to conventional TRUS biopsy. Using a large cohort (more than 1 million men – aged 40-80 years – diagnosed with an elevated PSA from 2010 to 2016) from a private insurer database, researchers examined the adoption of the mpMRI.

Results showed:

• Of the men diagnosed with elevated PSA, 3.9 percent underwent a prostate biopsy.
• Annual rates of MRI among those men receiving prostate biopsies increased significantly, from 5.2 per thousand in 2010 to 13.5 per thousand in 2016.
• Use of mpMRI increased across all age groups; however, the largest and only significant increase in use was in men aged 60 to 65 (4.4 in 2010 to 16.0 in 2016).

Study Details:
Publication #: MP57-08

Negative MRI: Which Patients Could Safely Avoid Prostate Biopsy? Results from Multi-Institutional Study in 401 Patients (MP57-08): Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is an effective tool to rule out clinically significant (Gleason > 3+4) and high-grade (Gleason > 4+3) prostate cancers and results could identify patients most likely to benefit from biopsy, according to this multi-institutional study of 401 patients. Using data from prostate biopsy databases at two referral centers, researchers examined diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI in men with negative mpMRI (PI-RADS <3 or Likert score <3) prior to biopsy.

Results showed:

• Of the 401 patients with negative mpMRI, 136 were diagnosed with prostate cancer.
• 46 patients were diagnosed with clinically significant disease and 20 patients with high-grade disease.
• Negative predictive values for identifying prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer or high-grade prostate cancer were 66 percent (265/401), 89 percent (355/401) and 95 percent (381/401).
• PSA doubling time and history of previous negative biopsy were independent predictors of non-clinically significant disease.

"In recent years, we've seen a growing body of research that supports the use of mpMRI in prostate cancer management," said Dr. Loeb. "These studies confirm the value of using this modality when possible, both for initial diagnosis and subsequent follow up as part of active surveillance protocols. They also show the potential for combining mpMRI with markers, such as the prostate health index, to reduce the number of biopsies."

About the American Urological Association: The 113^th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association takes place May 18-21 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA.Founded in 1902 and headquartered near Baltimore, Maryland, the American Urological Association is a leading advocate for the specialty of urology, and has more than 21,000 members throughout the world. The AUA is a premier urologic association, providing invaluable support to the urologic community as it pursues its mission of fostering the highest standards of urologic care through education, research and the formulation of health policy. 

Contact: Christine Frey, AUA
410-689-3731, cfrey@AUAnet.org

View original content with multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/use-of-magnetic-resonance-imaging-for-prostate-cancer-screening-and-management-300651236.html

SOURCE American Urological Association